I read H. 223 with interest, as well as the Caledonian article. Several thoughts come to mind:
*I
wish it didn't put all the responsibility on the Secretary (whoever
that may be) but instead would have a committee that deals with
enforcement, education, etc.
*On the whole, I agree with the
proposals. We all know that there are septics that leak, phosphate run
off into our lakes and streams, erosion from heavy rains on purely lawn
shorelines, etc. Buffers of low-growing shrubs are really helpful for
all of these. And it [buffers] helps keep the geese off the shoreline.
*Local
rules vary so much with each town about shorelines. I remember several
years ago worrying about some land being sold up by wetlands, that the
new owners would clear down to the
shore, that they would build too close, etc. I called the Town
official and told her my concerns and asked what their rules were. She
informed me they didn't care what people did. As far as she was
concerned, they could fill it in if they wished. So, it is really
important to have guidelines, rules that are consistent for all. It
protects the quality of the water for everyone.
*I may be
wrong, but the bill seemed to say that people who already had property
with lawn down to the shoreline were allowed to keep that. It is for
new development.
*Along West Shore Road the property that to
me has done the most sensitive and sensible treatment of shoreline is
that big tan clapboard house with the metal green roof. They have left a
lot of the trees along the shoreline, have a perfectly good view, I am
sure, and have several reasonable ways down to the water. It is really
well
done.
Just my thoughts.
Happy Easter!!
HDM
No comments:
Post a Comment